Jan 19 2010

Military Tribunals For Terrorists Act

The American people are rightfully outraged that enemy combatants who have declared war on America are being tried in civilian courts. I firmly believe that terrorists, with known ties to Al Qaeda, an organization that has sworn to destroy America and all that it stands for, should not be afforded the same constitutional protections as American citizens. Just as important, I believe that the corresponding release of sensitive homeland security and intelligence information, which will be required in civilian court proceedings, will jeopardize the safety and security of the United States.

That's why I have drafted legislation requiring terrorists to be tried as enemy combatants. The Obama Administration has announced it intends to try various terrorists in the United States in civilian courts.

My legislation is cosponsored by leading national experts, the vice chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Congressman Lamar Smith of Texas and the vice chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Congressman Howard McKeon of California.

My bill will take away the discretion to try terrorists in civilian court and mandate that they always be treated as enemy combatants and brought before a military tribunal.

In November Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the Administration would try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the suspected mastermind of the 9/11 attacks in civilian courts in New York. In December, the terrorist who attempted to blow up Northwest Airlines flight 253 as it landed in Detroit, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was taken into custody by the FBI, and arraigned in civilian court in Detroit. Now, reports indicate that the Obama administration will try another of the terrorists suspected of being involved in the 9/11 plot in Federal District Court in Washington D.C.

 

Make a donation in support of Vern's campaign in the amount you can afford.

Contribute Button

Bookmark and Share


Comments 1-5 of 5

« First < Prev Next > Last »
  • Donna Breedlove

    02/02/2010 03:02 PM

    What idiot had the bright idea of trying them in a civilian court??? It should be held on a military base where there is a lot of protection. It also wouldn't cost the tax payers more money for police protection.

  • Thomas MacKie

    02/01/2010 09:39 PM

    To treat an enemy combatant as anything other than an enemy combatant is completely foolhardy. It is the Federal Government's contitutionally mandated job to protect this country "against all enemies, foreign and domestic". ANYONE who has a stated goal of attacking, damaging or destroying the USA is, without a doubt, an enemy of this country. ANYONE who gives aid or comfort to such an enemy is ALSO an enemy... When an enemy of the USA is afforded the same civil rights as a loyal citizen is afforded, the person giving those rights to the enemy is, by default, giving aid and comfort to that enemy... Draw your own conclusions.

  • Walter W. McCue

    01/23/2010 06:28 PM

    Now that three states have gone the way of the GOP, how about us putting our resources toward the removal of Eric Holder

  • Walter Hunt

    01/19/2010 02:40 PM

    God bless you Vern. Finally someone with enough nerve to stand up and challenge these insane narcisist Obama nut bags. These people are hell bent of destroying America and are going to get us all killed.

  • David Edmonds

    01/19/2010 01:06 PM

    It is ridiculous to try these terrorist in civilian courts. What are we becoming?

    https://www.numisnetwork.com/dedmonds